Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Friday, April 30, 2010

Sunday, April 25, 2010



Technical Questions 2!

1 The starting size for this image was, width 8.6 and height 12.96

2 The new size will be the same width 8.6 by 17 inches and the space will be added to the bottom of the image.

3 The blue lines technical name is a guide.

4.To duplicate a layer you right click and select duplicate layer and then rename it and click ok when finished. to delate a layer you right click and drag the layer to the trash icon.

5 To make a new folder you click the folder icon located in the layers panel.

6. You cant move a locked layer!

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Friday, April 16, 2010

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Technical homework :)

1.The gradient tool is located in the 2nd section under the paintbrush tool its a rectangle with white - going to black.
The pen tool is located beside the Text tool and looks like the top of a script pen.
The shape tool is the other rectangle shape located under the Text tool.

2.The shape will be a rectangle and the gradient will be black to white going from left to right.

3.You would use the gradient tool and make the colours first and then change the opacity of the images.

4.You will have a path to vector art you need to cover over something and make it seem almost cartoon like.

5.It is not a closed path as the two points at the very bottom are not connected.

6.To make a rectangle you use the shape tool located under the Text tool and drag, the shape will be black as its the colour of the top swatch.

7. You click the shape tool and hold, a list of options will appear and from that you can choose the shape you want in this case it would be the circle.

8. 72 resolution is the proper screen resolution

9. DPI dots per inch

10. B because it is the larger image its 66.7% and the other image is only 50%

extra credit PPI stands for pixels per inch :)

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Photo blog critique

Photo emulation project

The lighting in this picture I feel was the strong point I was able to follow the same technique as Roversi by using a direct light on the subjects body and face to highlight those areas in particular, to do so I used a bedroom lamp, this I feel did not hinder my photo in any way were as my first attempts at using both natural light ( which I have no control over) and then a strobe light ( which was to bright and didn’t highlight in the right areas) both failed. The contrast I created between the paleness of my subject and the darkness of her hair I feel added to idea of a high end ‘fashion’ images and in my own personal opinion added to the picture. My subject unlike Roversi’s subject was not displaying natural beauty as she had makeup on in particular around her eyes to emphasise them. This was my way of making the picture my own and not a complete replica of Roversi’s work. The reasoning behind my subject not wearing makeup was because I wanted to capture the shallowness and societal pressure on teenagers to always look perfect and even when striped down to bare skin we still feel the need to wear makeup as now it’s a part of who we are.
I did emulate the others aspects of the Roversi image, the focus point was my subjects eyes and also my model emulated Roversi’s as she too was stripped down to the real her.
The areas where improvement is needed, for example is the shadow of my subject its very clear and noticeable in particular around the subjects arm I could have found away to make sure there was no shadow in the image I feel this would have made it altogether a stronger image.

Monday, February 1, 2010

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Friday, January 15, 2010

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Photo Proposal

Photo Proposal;
The Emulation project allowed me as a photographer to research a range of topics, for example fashion and nature. When researching for the previous posts I came across top fashion photographers, Paolo Roversi and David LaChapelle, both of the photographers work appealed to me for different reasons but mainly because I have interest in the area of work, as a loyal vogue reader and as a shopaholic naturally the fashion topic would be what I would base my project on. LaChapelle’s work stood out the most because it was colourful, bright and all his work was extremely original. However when it comes to me shooting the piece for the project I don’t think I have access to enough props, people, and experience to attempt to meet his standards. So when that was the case I researched some more and came across Roversi, his work appealed to me for a completely different reason, he did mainly portraits and seemed to show a real, natural beauty in mainly black and white. Basing my emulation project on his work will be a challenge for me as a photographer as well which I think is an additional reason to use his work for example; I will have to attempt to capture a simple natural beauty; I will need a model who ‘fits’ this image this means having a particular feature that stands out in a close up portrait. The example I gave of Roversi’s work was a close of up a girls face and her eyes where the focus point of the image. I will also have to learn how to change colour images into black and white, and create the perfect balances to insure the features don’t just blend in with the background.
Roversi’s work traditionally film images this may also make a difference as I will be shooting with digital however I am sure with practice I can make this method work for me.

Presentation feedback;
The use of a male model will be a challenge as trying to make them look natural sexy/ beautiful is almost harder for example; a males eyes aren't as seductive as a female can be. the use of males however was a liked factor of my proposal and i should attempt to use this idea.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Post 2 Emulation Project; 3 artists in detail :)

Are these digital photographs or film prints? Did the photographer use artificial lighting? Props? Can you spot any obvious or subtle Photoshop edits – if so, what kinds? Did making these photographs require a studio filled with assistants, or did the photographer work alone?

The 3 photographers I am going to evaluate in detail are;
Paolo Roversi (Fashion)
David Lachapelle (Fashion)
Anne Geddes (Baby and flower Photographer)

Paolo Roversi Born in Ravenna in 1947, Paolo Roversi’s interest in photography was kindled as a teenager during a family vacation in Spain in 1964. Back home, he set up a darkroom in a convenient cellar with another keen amateur, the local postman Battista Minguzzi, and began developing and printing his own black & white work. The encounter with a local professional photographer Nevio Natali was very important: in Nevio’s studio Paolo spent many many hours realising an important apprenticeship as well as a strong durable friendship.
Roversi photographs firstly appealed to me because each piece of work i viewed they all had a specific point of focus or obvious theme, for example the image i have selected the focus point is the subjects eyes. Roversi images where traditionally black and white film so therefore i am assuming that this image is not digital. I think that because this image was shot for a fashion magazine there was more than likely a crew there to deal with lighting and on set management. There is obvious lighting on the subjects face that would have been edited more than likely in photo shop. However in general any photo shop edits made are natural and do not ruin the photo.

David LaChapelle was born in Connecticut in 1969. He trained as a fine artist at North Carolina School of the Arts before moving to New York. Upon his arrival, LaChapelle enrolled at both the Art Students League and the School of Visual Arts. Not yet out of high school, he was offered his professional job by Andy Warhol to shoot for Interview Magazine.
LaChapelle's work appealed to me because generally it is high fashion photos with a twist his photos are fun, have a lot of background props, colour and expressions/moods that appeal to a young viewer.
There is a lot of editing added to the photo I choose for example; the contrast and colour have been changed to make the image seem brighter, more vibrant and have a pink tinge to it. The subject (lady gaga & other models) where more than likely airbrushed as well.

Anne Geddes is an Australian-born photographer, clothing designer and businesswoman who now lives and works in New Zealand. She is known for her stylized depictions of babies and motherhood.
In most of her work, babies or young children are dressed as fictitious characters such as fairies and fairytale creatures, flowers, or animals like bunnies. Her subjects are extremely idealized; babies in her photographs are almost always sleeping or staring into space, as if still in utero. She has described herself as "a baby freak".
Anne Geddes work appealed to me because she was the first artist I was exposed to, My mum has a photography book of hers and I did an art assignment on her for a different class.
All of her photos have been edited for example the one I chose Has been masked and the contrasted adjusted the green of the plant is extremely green in contrast with the black backdrop.Any photo's I have seen have has a backdrop, prop (in the form of costume or object) and most image have a general point of focus or theme, such as woodland creatures etc. Anne Geddes would have a purpose built set for her photos or back drop and would in most cases have a team of support with her for preparation on set and lighting needed for the photos.

Post One Emulation Project List 5 Photographers

Annie Leibovitz


Paolo Roversi






John Shaw



Dacid Lachapelle



Anne Geddis